
Director, Technical Support
Look, I don't think you can honestly say you're "committed to fair and equitable compensation for all of [your] employees" and then only post salary ranges for leadership positions. Come on.
Roles that involve reactively assisting customers with highly technical problems or with using highly technical products. Technical assistance is usually offered via email, phone, or video conference.
Look, I don't think you can honestly say you're "committed to fair and equitable compensation for all of [your] employees" and then only post salary ranges for leadership positions. Come on.
This role requires at least 5 years experience, is highly technical, and is described as “designed to deliver a higher level of partnership with the customer and is not a traditional ticket-by-ticket technical support role.” So why is the pay so low?
Points in favor: up-front about the challenges facing the team. Points against: C-Suite is all men. No mention of benefits or comp, asks for salary expectations in application.
Even aside from the problems in individual descriptions (of which there are plenty), having “Check out our open roles and see if you can make the cut” on your Careers page is an automatic Bingo for me, sorry not sorry.
$53k for a non-entry level, very technical role is laughable. The duties of the role and the title are also misaligned. And yes, again with the “not typical for offers to be made at or near the top of the [salary] range.”
Compensation is per project depending on complexity, so no comp is not a red flag.