CX Systems Administrator III
Seems like an interesting role that doesn't come up often. We have the usual suspects ("fast-paced, dynamic environment," hello darkness, my old friend), but otherwise, nothing especially worrisome.
Roles labeled as Senior or requiring 5 to 10 years of CX experience.
Seems like an interesting role that doesn't come up often. We have the usual suspects ("fast-paced, dynamic environment," hello darkness, my old friend), but otherwise, nothing especially worrisome.
I think they're asking this role to do a lot of things, and unless they're hiring more than one person through this listing, I'm worried about the long-term success and energy of whoever ends up in it.
Seems like a neat role, although I do wish the salary range was higher.
Boo, no salary transparency. Companies should always be transparent, not just when they have to be! I expected better from you, Airbnb.
Sounds like a neat Knowledge role, and the pay is great (especially for Knowledge work, which is often undervalued).
Seems fine, very corporate, but they're honest about that. Benefits are fine; pay is mostly okay – I think the low end is a little too low for a senior role, but not so low that it's a major flag.
Seems good! No major flags and the benefits are great. Salary seems a little on the low side for a Senior Customer Success Manager, but if it's just a base salary with commission, it could be great.
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean, but you should NEVER EVER take on risk on behalf of the company employing you unless you're, like, a firefighter or something. Which this is very much not.
No salary transparency and some interesting culture signals put this in Tread Carefully.
I understand that it's customary for there not to be salary transparency in international roles, but I refuse to excuse companies simply because they're not required to have it, *especially* when they claim to offer competitive salaries.
I debated on whether to rate this one as Tread Carefully or BINGO, and decided on BINGO because of the EEO statement.
I know this is a bit outside Support knowledge work, but I think it'd be a good fit for CX folks. The position seems fine, and the pay is great.
Reading through the job description, the title seems misleading—this feels more like an AI content automation position than a Knowledge & Education one.
So many flags in a single sentence! I appreciate their commitment to an efficient Bad Job Bingo game.
Genuinely one of the most diverse companies I've seen so far. And the rare case where a company claims diversity as a value and is clearly backing that up with their hiring. Cool!
I mean, I certainly dreamt of going to school for 4-6 years and earning a technical degree and THEN WORKING FOR ANOTHER 4+ YEARS to make $25 an hour for a company that won't even deign to give me a title that reflects the level of work I'm doing. WHERE DO I SIGN UP.
There certainly could be a language barrier here, but all of the Support role descriptions from this company are odd in the same ways.
There certainly could be a language barrier here, but all of the Support role descriptions from this company are odd in the same ways.
This company and job has the dubious honor of spawning not one, but TWO new BJB entries. I bet you can guess which ones.
There certainly could be a language barrier here, but all of the Support role descriptions from this company are odd in the same ways.
This is more of an IT Support role, although that's not clear from the title. Having worked for a similar company, the job description seems pretty straightforward for this kind of role.
Well-defined (and compensated) role and the company calls out in the JD how much they value their Success team. Obviously depends on how they actually treat the team, but it's nice to see.
Again, a CX pro with an EA background would be a great fit for this role (I know y'all are out there!) and the pay is great.
As with the other two roles listed here, no salary given and no mention of benefits anywhere.