Registered Customer Experience Representative
This one is somewhat better for having lower requirements, but still. Boo.
The job won Bad Job Bingo. Welp.
This one is somewhat better for having lower requirements, but still. Boo.
I take back everything I said about positive culture signals at Robinhood. It's enough to make you ask yourself: What would Robin Hood do in this situation?
This is the job description equivalent of that "This is fine" cartoon.
If the job descriptions mentioned tiny little things like compensation and benefits, I might not judge them so harshly, but it doesn't.
There's not a ton here, but what is here points to BINGO: no benefits, no salary transparency, and not-great culture signals.
I thought this was probably otherwise okay until we hit the "Personal Characteristics" section, which was just one red flag after another. Not to mention the "What's In It For You?" section contains no actual benefits, and we've got ourselves a BINGO.
I debated on whether to rate this one as Tread Carefully or BINGO, and decided on BINGO because of the EEO statement.
This job was fine, fine, mostly fine until we hit the last bits of it, and then it started telling one hell of a story.
I'm on the fence about Drata's "rules" – on the one hand I appreciate the rules are highly visible and clear. But there are also more elements of toxic startup philosophy than I am personally comfortable with.
If you've been taking a shot every time they exclaim you should be energized by something, you are already drunk and we haven't even gotten out of the introduction.
Again, such efficiency at getting to BINGO! Also, after all those super-specific requirements, "must have ethics" is sincerely hilarious.
So many flags in a single sentence! I appreciate their commitment to an efficient Bad Job Bingo game.
Pay is shit, especially for onsite in LA, especially for a multi-lingual role.
I think Snap might be the first company since I've started doing Bad Job Bingo to actually mention anything about wellness for Trust & Safety team members, so it has that going for it. Unfortunately, it also has enough flags that it hits BINGO.
Honestly, this job description is a mess. Repeated paragraphs and sections, overly business-speaky, and poorly edited and formatted.
This is not an Analyst role. Also, no mention of benefits anywhere in the JD or on the Careers page.
So...AI wrote this job description, and no one proofread / edited it? Cool.
The salary range is interesting, to say the least – the low side is way too low, and I don't trust that the high side is actually on the table.
My first thought when looking at this company's Careers page was: "My god, they desperately need a middle-aged manager to decline their screentime requests an hour before bedtime."
Okay, for starters, none (save one) of the duties listed in this JD are Lead-level duties. They clearly want a discount Director/VP of Support. (And at $70k-$150k, we're talking a *real* discount.)
Ah, so they want a discount manager. Cooooool.
Every time they talk about how fun they are, another venture capitalist gets a little red flag pocket square.
I'm extremely confused. Maybe they posted the wrong job description under this job title?