
Technical Support Analyst
"High stakes" in a job like this means the product doesn't work, or only works enough to be dangerous. You're there as a human shield between the customer and the product, and I promise it isn't even as fun as it sounds.
The job won Bad Job Bingo. Welp.
"High stakes" in a job like this means the product doesn't work, or only works enough to be dangerous. You're there as a human shield between the customer and the product, and I promise it isn't even as fun as it sounds.
I think the AI is confused about what Customer Success does.
Blacklane's Careers page is pretty bare-bones, with very little actual useful information, not unlike this job description!
Look, I'm being kind by only putting this in BINGO.
Look, this company sounds weird, the role sounds weird, and the fact that they can't tell you what the pay is is weird. We've got a weird club sandwich of a job listing here, is what I'm saying.
Welp, a red flag right up front. What a way to dive back into Bad Job Bingo!
Still just vibes, still a BINGO.
Since they're expecting candidates to operate on vibes only, so am I! And my vibes tell me this is a BINGO.
Ding ding ding, we have a (BINGO) winner.
All of this is just a red flag. No information about what supports the Teir 1 team receives, which makes me think they shouldn't expect to receive any, which is just bad news.
Okay, so look. This could just be me. I am highly suspicious and cynical, I fully own that. But everything in this job description just comes across as slightly off. Just, like, this side of reasonable.
Hoo boy. Why does this read to me as "We will give you no resources, we will change the parameters of success constantly, and we will offer little to no support toward meeting your strategic goals. Good luck!"
The main ones: Fast-paced environment, rapidly changing requirements, poorly-edited JD requires attention to detail, JD doesn't mention benefits at all, and salary for leadership roles is good but not for frontline roles.
See the Senior Customer Success Manager position for what Oyster did that pissed me off so much that I automatically BINGOed out this one too.
I don't even care what the rest of the job description says. I am invoking my power as Supreme Bad Job Bingo Dictator to automatically BINGO this company out.
This one is somewhat better for having lower requirements, but still. Boo.
I take back everything I said about positive culture signals at Robinhood. It's enough to make you ask yourself: What would Robin Hood do in this situation?
This is the job description equivalent of that "This is fine" cartoon.
If the job descriptions mentioned tiny little things like compensation and benefits, I might not judge them so harshly, but it doesn't.
There's not a ton here, but what is here points to BINGO: no benefits, no salary transparency, and not-great culture signals.
I thought this was probably otherwise okay until we hit the "Personal Characteristics" section, which was just one red flag after another. Not to mention the "What's In It For You?" section contains no actual benefits, and we've got ourselves a BINGO.
I debated on whether to rate this one as Tread Carefully or BINGO, and decided on BINGO because of the EEO statement.
This job was fine, fine, mostly fine until we hit the last bits of it, and then it started telling one hell of a story.
I'm on the fence about Drata's "rules" – on the one hand I appreciate the rules are highly visible and clear. But there are also more elements of toxic startup philosophy than I am personally comfortable with.