Global Head of Partner Support, Google Cloud
This whole JD is a sloppy mess, but hey, at least the pay's good?
This whole JD is a sloppy mess, but hey, at least the pay's good?
This one is somewhat better for having lower requirements, but still. Boo.
I take back everything I said about positive culture signals at Robinhood. It's enough to make you ask yourself: What would Robin Hood do in this situation?
Overall, there are positive culture signals for the company, but I'm concerned that this position will be stretched too thin to provide the leadership and mentorship Robinhood wants to see, and there's some scope creep I'd ask about as an interviewee.
You should do a general internet search for Therapy Brands. The results are...not good, particularly in light of the fuss they make about how awesome they are on their Careers page.
It is galling – to say the least – to see Siena hiring human support for their product when they're happy enough for it to fuel an exaggerated AI craze that's led to a CX employment crisis everywhere else. The words irony and hypocrisy come to mind.
Seems fine, very corporate, but they're honest about that. Benefits are fine; pay is mostly okay – I think the low end is a little too low for a senior role, but not so low that it's a major flag.
This job seems fine if very, very corporate.
All of this together paints a worrying picture of internal culture, especially how it relates to what's expected of the Support function.
I don't know if the hiring manager is an immature manager or what's happening here, but whoever wrote this job description does not have a good grasp of what makes a CX professional successful in their work. The only thing keeping this out of BINGO is that the salary is decent.
It's a call center director position at a corporate giant, so, you know. Do with that what you will.
Well-defined (and compensated) role and the company calls out in the JD how much they value their Success team. Obviously depends on how they actually treat the team, but it's nice to see.
Given the work this role will be doing and how often they will be working with senior leadership, I think it probably should have a more senior title and a slightly higher salary range.
Y'all know by now that it doesn't sit well with me when leadership roles are well-compensated and frontline roles are not.
That salary is too low for what they want this role to do, especially considering it's not entry-level and they're a SaaS tech company.
Every time they talk about how fun they are, another venture capitalist gets a little red flag pocket square.
Salary range is wide but high enough that I don't think anyone will really care.
Excellent benefits, including 4-day work weeks. That *might* have something to do with the Kickstarter union. I'm just saying.
There's an identical role open for San Francisco on Checkr's Jobs page.
This role requires at least 5 years experience, is highly technical, and is described as “designed to deliver a higher level of partnership with the customer and is not a traditional ticket-by-ticket technical support role.” So why is the pay so low?