Customer Engineer
THIS IS NOT SUPPORT ENGINEER WORK. Is something in the water? Is Venus in retrograde? Am I in the Upside Down? WHAT IS HAPPENING.
Roles requiring 1 to 3 years of CX experience.
THIS IS NOT SUPPORT ENGINEER WORK. Is something in the water? Is Venus in retrograde? Am I in the Upside Down? WHAT IS HAPPENING.
I don't know if the hiring manager is an immature manager or what's happening here, but whoever wrote this job description does not have a good grasp of what makes a CX professional successful in their work. The only thing keeping this out of BINGO is that the salary is decent.
This actually seems like a fairly well-scoped role, but the lack of salary transparency and culture issues that surfaced in the Head of Support role put this in Tread Carefully.
As with the Director of Support role, no comp given, no mention of benefits anywhere.
That salary is too low for what they want this role to do, especially considering it's not entry-level and they're a SaaS tech company.
I don't see any major flags and that's a good salary range for an early career role.
The job description overall seems fine, but the pay is piddly for an onsite role in San Francisco, especially for a technical role. It's low enough, in fact, that I'm putting it in Tread Carefully.
I was worried about doing this one, because I'm such a fan of the product, but Scribe's Careers page is really well done and the job description is mostly fine.
I really, really hate when the salary is good for leadership roles but poor for frontline roles. The salary is especially egregious considering that it's billed as a technical role, with fluency in Spanish or Portuguese as a nice-to-have. I literally booed when I read that.
I think there's a lot of performance about culture happening on Pulley's Careers page, especially considering the explanation of culture they link to is a Twitter thread from 2020.
I think the pay is a little low for the level of work this role will be doing, but then I pretty much always think CX folks should be paid more.
Strangely wide salary range, although it may be because they'll consider entry-level candidates.
Yes, it's AI. I'm as surprised as you. The job description is honest and straightforward, the compensation is fantastic for a role at this level, the benefits are great, the job application is thoughtful and not burdensome to applicants, and their Careers page is clear and informative. Wild, huh?
A bilingual candidate with a bachelor's degree in computer science and technical expertise in cloud applications, mobile computing, and hardware device troubleshooting should not be making $35,403 to $59,500. I mean, come the fuck on.
I've gotten multiple reports of this being a shady company with especially shady hiring practices. It also appears the Department of Labor is investigating them over unpaid overtime hours for its contractors.
This job was mostly fine until we got to the "We're ideally seeking" section and then it was just downhill from there.
After the first two poorly-edited job descriptions, it's just funny now.
What is with all the "Poorly-edited job description requires attention to detail" winners lately?
Job application is through Workday. My condolences.
I waffled on where this one should go (BINGO or Seriously, Maybe Don't). There's no Careers page, just a perfunctory EO statement at the bottom of their Jobs page along with a frankly alarming Values statement.
Same deal as with the Customer Success Manager – it's almost the exact same listing, including the degree requirements/GPA question, which seems like even more of a red flag.