I read bad jobs so you don't have to.
The biggest problems are 1) they fall into the "it's a benefit to work here!" trap, and 2) they claim a competitive compensation package without actually sharing what the comp is. The latter, of course, means that this is a Tread Carefully job.
It's probably a little pathetic how easy it is to get me on your side as an AI company. Oh, you're doing the bare minimum? WOULD YOU LIKE A COOKIE?
I'm putting this in BINGO purely for how insufferable this company sounds.
Honestly, this job description is pretty forgettable. It's not terrible, but it's not good either; candidates get very little information about the structure of the team they'd be leading, and the only hint at culture we get is a single bullet about the office being pet-friendly.
Y'all, I've said what the actual fuck so many times with this JD it's lost all meaning. I don't even know what to say, except that I don't think our existing ratings quite cover this one, so I had to create a special one: Possibly Psychotic.
Yeah, no. Tread Carefully.
I'm glad that my anxiety was proven unnecessary – this sounds like a great job with great pay and benefits. It's not so outstanding that I feel comfortable giving it a Green Means Go, but it's a high Eh, It's Probably Fine.
Overall, this is a solid Eh, It's Probably Fine. Aside from a few flags (and asking for salary expectations on the application), it seems like a decent remote role with good benefits.
"High stakes" in a job like this means the product doesn't work, or only works enough to be dangerous. You're there as a human shield between the customer and the product, and I promise it isn't even as fun as it sounds.
