Global Head of Partner Support, Google Cloud
This whole JD is a sloppy mess, but hey, at least the pay's good?
This whole JD is a sloppy mess, but hey, at least the pay's good?
Aside from the higher experience requirement, it's not at all clear what makes this role more senior than the other Success role. It's not *that* worrisome, but I'd ask about it in interviews.
So this role isn't for candidates who'd describe themselves as sloth-like ditherers fond of throwing up impediments? Phew, really dodged a bullet by making that clear.
For roles in companies like these, upsides for some can be downsides for others: they're often really old-school working environments that tend to favor stability over rapid innovation. You skip a lot of the startup bullshit, but obviously, Business Granddaddies come with their own kind of bullshit.
That whole paragraph – the whole JD, actually – is like a parody of itself. It's a dull, meaningless, satirical mess.
The belly laugh I just gave at a company that constantly repeats itself and can barely put together a sentence requiring "flawless detail orientation." Pretty sure it's the only thing keeping me from slipping into a boredom-induced coma.
My god, this job description is boring. I legit just nodded off.
Friends. You're in sales. You know pretty words like "competitive," "generous," and "comprehensive" mean nothing unless there's data to back them up. What are the numbers? Tell me the numbers!
This role will already be leading the whole Support function, that it's not already at least a manager-level role is, frankly, absurd.
Well, this took a turn. Between this casual ableism, the lack of salary transparency despite competitive claims, and their ask for compensation expectations on the application, the JD practically puts itself in Tread Carefully.
Seems like a pretty straightforward onboarding role, with the usual startup suspects ("fun" team, fast-paced environment, adapt to change/challenges, let's do the time warp again). Nothing too concerning, and the pay is good for an early-career gig.
Overall, though, this job seems pretty straightforward, the benefits are fine, and the pay is good for a fairly entry-level remote role. Nice to see a solid Eh, It's Probably Fine for this week's issue.
It is so infuriating when companies want the credit of giving a salary without actually giving the salary, which is such utter bullshit, especially from a company with stated values of "Trustworthiness" and "Accountability."
And by "ability to work under pressure" they mean okay with slowly being crushed under the weight of expectations, inexperience, and your 300-500 accounts until you're a tiny, person-shaped material denser than osmium.
All of this is just a red flag. No information about what supports the Teir 1 team receives, which makes me think they shouldn't expect to receive any, which is just bad news.
Okay, so look. This could just be me. I am highly suspicious and cynical, I fully own that. But everything in this job description just comes across as slightly off. Just, like, this side of reasonable.
There are two different job titles in this job description, Manager, Customer Success and Customer Success Manager. Which one refers to this role specifically? Your guess is as good as mine.
I swear I entered the role title exactly as it's displayed on the job listing. I'm not sure what's going on with this role, but the title in the actual job description is Customer Onboarding Manager, so...I dunno, man, I'm just the rater.
Otherwise, it seems like a straightforward onboarding role, but accessibility issues and lack of salary transparency puts it squarely in Tread Carefully.
Oh wow, how unique brightwheel is! Because most startups move like molasses and expect their people to come in and fail immediately and repeatedly.
The main ones: Fast-paced environment, rapidly changing requirements, poorly-edited JD requires attention to detail, JD doesn't mention benefits at all, and salary for leadership roles is good but not for frontline roles.
Nope, that's...that's the salary. That's the real salary in reality.
Can we just acknowledge that maybe it is recklessly, unforgivably irresponsible to allow 20-somethings who appear to have no professional experience before 2022 to be in charge of AI products that could destabilize democracies?
This is essentially a Director role with engineer duties, and right now, the salary is only compensating for one of those things.