Technical Support Engineer
I think maybe I drank a really bad batch of coffee because nothing makes sense anymore.
The job won Bad Job Bingo. Welp.
I think maybe I drank a really bad batch of coffee because nothing makes sense anymore.
A bilingual candidate with a bachelor's degree in computer science and technical expertise in cloud applications, mobile computing, and hardware device troubleshooting should not be making $35,403 to $59,500. I mean, come the fuck on.
Basically a can of Chock Full O' Nopes.
This job was mostly fine until we got to the "We're ideally seeking" section and then it was just downhill from there.
Y'all, the Company Careers page BINGOed before I even got to the job description, which actually looks fairly normal (if only available on LinkedIn). Not that I think y'all are doing this, but if anyone is, this is a really good example of why you can't just apply to a role based off a job listing.
After the first two poorly-edited job descriptions, it's just funny now.
What is with all the "Poorly-edited job description requires attention to detail" winners lately?
Candidates should have a strong attention to detail, but the company can't consistently capitalize its own name. Okay!
I'll give Mosiac props on owning their job descriptions – I definitely think a person wrote this.
This job description is something else. There I am, minding my own business, thinking this is a normal junior customer service role, and then I read with own two eyes: "A minimum of 7 years in an OPIS CS position[...]or 5-10 years experience in a contact center/customer service environment."
So much casual (and occasionally weirdly aggressive) ableism in this job listing. Also, the video on their careers page is 1) a product sales pitch, and 2) all dudes. Is the entire leadership team just dudes?
This is a mid-senior role at least – major misalignment between title/responsibilities and requirements.
I waffled on where this one should go (BINGO or Seriously, Maybe Don't). There's no Careers page, just a perfunctory EO statement at the bottom of their Jobs page along with a frankly alarming Values statement.
This job description is wacky. Some of the responsibilities are reasonable for a role at this level, and some are most definitely not.
Title/seniority are misaligned with the responsibilities of the role. Lots of flags in the "Who you are" section which makes me think this role would not be well supported.
Same deal as with the Customer Success Manager – it's almost the exact same listing, including the degree requirements/GPA question, which seems like even more of a red flag.
I'll take "What job description was written by AI?" for $400, Alex.
The duties and responsibilities of this role are woefully, hilariously misaligned with the job title. Yikes.
I will be forever outraged / amused by companies that say their comp is competitive, don’t provide said comp, and then have the audacity to say they’re looking for someone who wants to hold a role for the long-term.
This is an alarmingly low salary for what appears to be at least 3 roles in one. Other flags: poorly edited job description, random mentions of required skills unrelated to job title, generic offering of “Benefits and health insurance.”
Neither the title nor the compensation is aligned with the duties of this role.