Senior Technical Support Engineer
The Must Haves section makes this essentially a highly-skilled senior communicator/engineer role, which makes the salary way too low for what they're asking for.
The Must Haves section makes this essentially a highly-skilled senior communicator/engineer role, which makes the salary way too low for what they're asking for.
I really, really hate when the salary is good for leadership roles but poor for frontline roles. The salary is especially egregious considering that it's billed as a technical role, with fluency in Spanish or Portuguese as a nice-to-have. I literally booed when I read that.
Other than the product being a dystopian nightmare and the fact that "View Open Positions" just directs back to LinkedIn, the job itself is okay. There's a misalignment between the duties of the role and the job title, and the salary is oddly wide. I think this goes firmly in Tread Carefully.
This one is good too. Ignore any weeping you might hear. The salary range is kind of wide, but it's okay because IT'S A UNION POSITION. A UNION. FOR REAL.
See the Director, Customer Support listing for more on why this position also hit BINGO.
This seems okay? They're honest about the fact the company's experimenting with what works and what doesn't, which I appreciate, and the pay is pretty good for a non-technical, actually mid-level manager role.
10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE for at most $67k at a SaaS company? Am I reading that right? WHAT THE HELL.
Strangely wide salary range; based on the Qualifications section, this is not an entry-level role.
Strangely wide salary range, although it may be because they'll consider entry-level candidates.
My biggest concern is that the pay seems really low for what reads like a mid-level Engineering job description – reads to me like they're trying to get a Dev on the cheap by placing them under Customer Success.
This job was mostly fine until we got to the "We're ideally seeking" section and then it was just downhill from there.
Still no mention of benefits, still probably only offering $65k for an on-site non-entry level role in NYC.
They repeat "dynamic environment" a lot. There are several other Success and Support roles open and the ones I've seen are pretty fair compensation-wise, so worth a look if working in a "fast moving dynamic environment" doesn't phase you.
That's a suspiciously wide salary range. Also, the "ensure 100% client retention with high client satisfaction (9/10+ NPS scores)" made me do a double-take.
This is another wide salary range, but seeing as they're open to folks who are newer as managers, I actually think it's a good thing.
Suspiciously wide salary range.
A bilingual candidate with a bachelor's degree in computer science and technical expertise in cloud applications, mobile computing, and hardware device troubleshooting should not be making $35,403 to $59,500. I mean, come the fuck on.
This job description is something else. There I am, minding my own business, thinking this is a normal junior customer service role, and then I read with own two eyes: "A minimum of 7 years in an OPIS CS position[...]or 5-10 years experience in a contact center/customer service environment."
So much casual (and occasionally weirdly aggressive) ableism in this job listing. Also, the video on their careers page is 1) a product sales pitch, and 2) all dudes. Is the entire leadership team just dudes?
I have many concerns. That the title of the role doesn't match the title in the job description. The ridiculous salary. That the company has no Careers page and the role is only listed on LinkedIn. The stability/longevity of a company staking money on other people playing video games.
I'm curious as to why this isn't a Director or Head of-level role when the description says that "Petvisor is the holding company for several subsidiaries [...] This is an exciting employment opportunity with responsibilities spanning the portfolio of companies."
This job description is wacky. Some of the responsibilities are reasonable for a role at this level, and some are most definitely not.
$53k for a non-entry level, very technical role is laughable. The duties of the role and the title are also misaligned. And yes, again with the “not typical for offers to be made at or near the top of the [salary] range.”