Community Enablement Lead
This seems like an interesting Community role with a sizeable dash of Education, and I see no flags. Pay is great. Green Means Go!
Roles requiring 3 to 5 years of CX experience.
This seems like an interesting Community role with a sizeable dash of Education, and I see no flags. Pay is great. Green Means Go!
The only reason this isn't going into Green Means Go is that a few responsibilities seem a little senior for this title. That could just be a lack of knowledge of their internal structure and leveling, though. Everything else seems good, and the pay is good for a technical/financial role.
Scream it with me: BEEEEEEEENEFITS AAAAAAAARE NOOOOOOOOOT PEEEEEEEEERKS
It's not the fall that kills you. It's the shitty pay at the bottom.
Really puts that DEI statement into perspective, though. "We encourage underrepresented minorities to be underpaid in this role, which will affect their future compensation for years, if not forever."
I don't even remember which job I was supposed to be rating. Goddamn. Oh right, Customer Support Specialist. I'm sure this will be *fine.*
Given the unusual schedule expectations and the very specific technical skills and experience required for this role, that salary range is not great. I mean, with the poor job market, they'll probably be able to hire someone at that comp, but. I'm not impressed. Tread Carefully.
Because it makes me feel hopeful about AI, I'm tentatively putting this in Green Means Go.
Not much to say about this one; the duties and qualifications seem pretty straightforward, and the salary is decent for a Docs role. Solid Eh, It's Probably Fine.
Overall, this is a solid Eh, It's Probably Fine. Aside from a few flags (and asking for salary expectations on the application), it seems like a decent remote role with good benefits.
"High stakes" in a job like this means the product doesn't work, or only works enough to be dangerous. You're there as a human shield between the customer and the product, and I promise it isn't even as fun as it sounds.
Look, I'm being kind by only putting this in BINGO.
I am immediately suspicious of companies that in one breath brag about how great a workplace they are and then, in the next, make it clear that they are only being transparent about salary because they are legally required to in NY, CO, or CA. Honestly, it's fucking laughable.
I am deeply unimpressed with CoreWeave's showing here. Tread Carefully.
The belly laugh I just gave at a company that constantly repeats itself and can barely put together a sentence requiring "flawless detail orientation." Pretty sure it's the only thing keeping me from slipping into a boredom-induced coma.
I swear I entered the role title exactly as it's displayed on the job listing. I'm not sure what's going on with this role, but the title in the actual job description is Customer Onboarding Manager, so...I dunno, man, I'm just the rater.
Otherwise, it seems like a straightforward onboarding role, but accessibility issues and lack of salary transparency puts it squarely in Tread Carefully.
See the Senior Customer Success Manager position for what Oyster did that pissed me off so much that I automatically BINGOed out this one too.
This role sounds fascinating and the pay is fantastic. I see no flags, so we've got our first (and only?) Green Means Go of the week.
I take back everything I said about positive culture signals at Robinhood. It's enough to make you ask yourself: What would Robin Hood do in this situation?
I don't know, y'all; my spidey sense is tingling with this one. It could be nothing, but just...tread very carefully.
*MC voice* Ladies, gentlemen, and variations thereupon: here we have the latest and greatest in corporate employee management: Sparring sessions! For when verbally berating your employees just isn't enough. The beatings will continue until performance improves.
Yes, I am putting this in Green Means Go despite no salary transparency, only because the hiring location is Europe / Middle East / Africa, which is so broad that it makes giving an actual salary range genuinely difficult, and everything else is just positive signals.
I thought this was probably otherwise okay until we hit the "Personal Characteristics" section, which was just one red flag after another. Not to mention the "What's In It For You?" section contains no actual benefits, and we've got ourselves a BINGO.