
Customer Experience Manager
Title/seniority are misaligned with the responsibilities of the role. Lots of flags in the "Who you are" section which makes me think this role would not be well supported.
Roles that allow you to work full-time from your home or other location determined by you.
Title/seniority are misaligned with the responsibilities of the role. Lots of flags in the "Who you are" section which makes me think this role would not be well supported.
Same deal as with the Customer Success Manager – it's almost the exact same listing, including the degree requirements/GPA question, which seems like even more of a red flag.
I waffled on where this one should go (BINGO or Seriously, Maybe Don't). There's no Careers page, just a perfunctory EO statement at the bottom of their Jobs page along with a frankly alarming Values statement.
This job was this close to making it into Green Means Go, but there’s a misalignment between the duties of the position and the job title, so alas, into this category it goes.
This one is listed under two different titles for a total of 4 times on their website. Not sure what’s up with that.
Compensation is per project depending on complexity, so no comp is not a red flag.
This is an odd one. I’d expect to see both on-the-ground and macro-level responsibilities for a role like this, but it’s in such an odd mix that it comes across as if they didn’t consult the actual Support team when writing it or they’re not actually sure what they want out of the role.
Shippo isn’t nearly as transparent about this frontline role as they are about the Senior Manager, Product Support role, which doesn’t sit well with me.
As Director of Product Support, you’ll lead a team of knowledgeable and dedicated associates and managers in their work to support and grow our creators’ businesses while maintaining performance KPIs.
$53k for a non-entry level, very technical role is laughable. The duties of the role and the title are also misaligned. And yes, again with the “not typical for offers to be made at or near the top of the [salary] range.”
The benefits for this role/company are some of the best I’ve seen.
This is an alarmingly low salary for what appears to be at least 3 roles in one. Other flags: poorly edited job description, random mentions of required skills unrelated to job title, generic offering of “Benefits and health insurance.”
The company claims this comp is highly competitive, however considering the duties of the role and the (at their own admission) highly-complex product and the fact it’s a FinTech company, I’m calling bullshit. Otherwise, it seems fine.
Given the very different work locations, the lack of a comp range isn’t a red flag to me.
I will be forever outraged / amused by companies that say their comp is competitive, don’t provide said comp, and then have the audacity to say they’re looking for someone who wants to hold a role for the long-term.
Points in favor: up-front about the challenges facing the team. Points against: C-Suite is all men. No mention of benefits or comp, asks for salary expectations in application.
This role requires at least 5 years experience, is highly technical, and is described as “designed to deliver a higher level of partnership with the customer and is not a traditional ticket-by-ticket technical support role.” So why is the pay so low?