Director, Customer Success
Man, I really want to put this in Eh, It's Probably Fine, but alas, they claim a competitive salary without then sharing the salary. So – well, you know how this ends.
Didn’t quite hit bingo, but there were several yellow flags or more than one red flag.
Man, I really want to put this in Eh, It's Probably Fine, but alas, they claim a competitive salary without then sharing the salary. So – well, you know how this ends.
It's our job as leadership to create an environment of respect for our customer support teams among our customers. If things are so bad that you have to specify "professional resilience" in your candidates, that's a failure of leadership and the company, not in potential candidates.
I understand that it's customary for there not to be salary transparency in international roles, but I refuse to excuse companies simply because they're not required to have it, *especially* when they claim to offer competitive salaries.
This role has the same weird (and ableist) culture signals as the other roles from this company. Also, there's no salary transparency and the application asks for your target comp range, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
This role has the same weird (and ableist) culture signals as the other roles at this company. And while there is salary transparency here (likely due to state laws requiring it, which is also a culture signal), the application asks for your target comp range, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
This role has the same weird (and ableist) culture signals as the other Manager roles. Also, there's no salary transparency and the application asks for your target comp range, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
This role has the same weird (and ableist) culture signals as the Manager role. Also, there's no salary transparency and the application asks for your target comp range, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
I'm just a girl, standing in front of a faceless company, asking them to stop saying this ableist bullshit.
This role has the same weird (and ableist) culture signals as the other Manager roles. Also, there's no salary transparency and the application asks for your target comp range, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
Nothing in particular is jumping out at me, but I confess I did skim. Did I mention it's long? Also that salary is as wide as the JD is verbose. One might say comically so.
I can tell you that I think they're asking too much from a Manager-level role, and I think the evolution in their Support approach is a bad signal for the function and the company's future. Tread Carefully.
On the one hand, the company has obviously put a lot of effort into thoughtful recruitment and in employee benefits. On the other, there are some flags here that I'd ask about.
Reading through the job description, the title seems misleading—this feels more like an AI content automation position than a Knowledge & Education one.
I know I sound like a broken record, but there's a misalignment between this role's duties and its title/seniority. Also, no salary transparency.
I'm not putting this in Tread Carefully because anything in the job is jumping out at me specifically – let's say it's a general wariness about Google's working environment and the fact that the company doesn't address how they protect the mental health of those working in Trust & Safety.
This role seems like an interesting blend of Trust & Safety, Community, and Customer Support. Alas, there's no salary transparency, though, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
I am really struggling to understand this role at Match Group in comparison to the Trust & Safety Policy Manager role at Tinder (one of the dating apps in Match Group's portfolio).
I'm upgrading this to Tread Carefully based on their wisdom, but I'm still concerned that the junior title and experience requirements coupled with the pretty senior job duties is not a great mix for success.
I was still mostly on board until I saw the salary. They want a discount engineer. LOL K!
When I see the word "diplomatic" or any variation, I immediately start to worry about internal collaboration culture (or lack thereof).
Can we not? Can we just not require a T&S professional to have a "fun" attitude, especially when you haven't given any space to explaining how you'll care for their mental well-being? Ugh. Honestly, that pisses me off enough to put this into Tread Carefully.
So this job closed and then re-opened at some point since early February. Which, uh, seems like not the greatest sign, you know?
The duties make sense for the title and seniority. This role seems to have actual authority to drive the strategy and resources of their team. The benefits look great. So I am genuinely sad to put this in Tread Carefully.
All of this together paints a worrying picture of internal culture, especially how it relates to what's expected of the Support function.