Head of Customer Success
Nope, that's...that's the salary. That's the real salary in reality.
Nope, that's...that's the salary. That's the real salary in reality.
While this feels like it could be a young company still trying to figure out its culture and hiring practices, there are still some red flags that are hard to ignore, so I think it still belongs in Tread Carefully.
It seems like a pretty straightforward Director role, but this is one of those times where playing Bad Job Bingo is more an art than a science because I'm getting a weird vibe from this job description.
Seems like an interesting role that doesn't come up often. We have the usual suspects ("fast-paced, dynamic environment," hello darkness, my old friend), but otherwise, nothing especially worrisome.
The difference is that this role is pretty entry-level and offers an avenue for folks in hospitality-based customer service roles to transition into a remote tech support role, gaining valuable startup experience in the meantime.
Not much to say about this one except that I'm irritated this leadership role is salaried and more adequately compensated while the frontline roles are not. That's some bullshit, Ramp.
This one is somewhat better for having lower requirements, but still. Boo.
I take back everything I said about positive culture signals at Robinhood. It's enough to make you ask yourself: What would Robin Hood do in this situation?
Oh my dog, y'all! Y'ALL. THERE'S SALARY TRANSPARENCY FOR THIS INTERNATIONAL ROLE!!!
Oh my dog, y'all! Y'ALL. THERE'S SALARY TRANSPARENCY FOR THIS INTERNATIONAL ROLE!!!
Oh my dog, y'all! Y'ALL. THERE'S SALARY TRANSPARENCY FOR THIS INTERNATIONAL ROLE!!!
I think they're asking this role to do a lot of things, and unless they're hiring more than one person through this listing, I'm worried about the long-term success and energy of whoever ends up in it.
Seems like a neat role, although I do wish the salary range was higher.
Assuming this isn't just for show and they really are rewarding existing employee work and loyalty, it seems like a green flag to me. Overall, this is a clear job description and I see nothing but positive culture signals, so I'm throwing this in Green Means Go!
The role itself seems fine, but the salary range is very wide, and the low end is way too low for a Lead role (especially at a company like Netflix). I don't think that's enough to put it in Tread Carefully, but I would ask about it if I were a candidate.
Seems fine, very corporate, but they're honest about that. Benefits are fine; pay is mostly okay – I think the low end is a little too low for a senior role, but not so low that it's a major flag.
Seems good! No major flags and the benefits are great. Salary seems a little on the low side for a Senior Customer Success Manager, but if it's just a base salary with commission, it could be great.
This job seems fine if very, very corporate.
I debated on whether to rate this one as Tread Carefully or BINGO, and decided on BINGO because of the EEO statement.
This job was fine, fine, mostly fine until we hit the last bits of it, and then it started telling one hell of a story.
I'm on the fence about Drata's "rules" – on the one hand I appreciate the rules are highly visible and clear. But there are also more elements of toxic startup philosophy than I am personally comfortable with.
This role has the same weird (and ableist) culture signals as the other roles at this company. And while there is salary transparency here (likely due to state laws requiring it, which is also a culture signal), the application asks for your target comp range, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
Nothing in particular is jumping out at me, but I confess I did skim. Did I mention it's long? Also that salary is as wide as the JD is verbose. One might say comically so.
Again, such efficiency at getting to BINGO! Also, after all those super-specific requirements, "must have ethics" is sincerely hilarious.