Implementation Product Specialist - Fire Documentation/ePCR - Canada
As with the Director of Support role, no comp given, no mention of benefits anywhere.
As with the Director of Support role, no comp given, no mention of benefits anywhere.
This isn't necessarily a red flag given the nature of First Due's product (software for EMS and Fire agencies), but when I read this I thought for sure they'd have a great compensation package to go with this requirement! But nope, they don't.
Again, a CX pro with an EA background would be a great fit for this role (I know y'all are out there!) and the pay is great.
I'm posting this here because 1) A CX professional would absolutely kill it in this role, and 2) GET THAT MONEY.
Ah, so they want a discount manager. Cooooool.
This really should be a more senior title – Head of, at least. But the salary, responsibilities, and requirements of the position seem otherwise appropriate for the title of manager, and the Careers page looks good.
I'm not putting this in Tread Carefully because anything in the job is jumping out at me specifically – let's say it's a general wariness about Google's working environment and the fact that, again, the company doesn't address how they protect the mental health of those working in Trust & Safety.
Same concerns as with the Support Intern position – no indication of what the pay is or even if the internship is paid at all.
That salary is too low for what they want this role to do, especially considering it's not entry-level and they're a SaaS tech company.
So...this role is a Senior Manager, Strategic Customer Success managing Senior Customer Success Managers collaborating with Account Managers, Managing Directors and Customer Success Managers. Who's on first?
For a hybrid role in NYC, that seems like a low salary range. And there's a *new* two-for-one! Amazing, monday.com over here disrupting corporate red flags, love it.
Every time they talk about how fun they are, another venture capitalist gets a little red flag pocket square.
Ehhhhh. Look. Most people want to do the very best they can, and yes, overachieve. But I am immediately suspicious of any company that wants to codify an employee doing more than what they're being paid for.
Y'all know by now that it doesn't sit well with me when leadership roles are well-compensated and frontline roles are not.
Seems great – the Careers page is straightforward and informative and so is the job description. They seem to have a clear idea of their mission and what they're looking for in this role and they avoid euphemisms for startup life that often spell trouble in companies like this.
I don't see any major flags and that's a good salary range for an early career role.
The job description overall seems fine, but the pay is piddly for an onsite role in San Francisco, especially for a technical role. It's low enough, in fact, that I'm putting it in Tread Carefully.
If I score this strictly, it could be a BINGO, but I'm not going to. Honestly, for the right person, going in with their eyes open (and assuming the pay doesn't suck)? It could be an interesting, meaty role.
"You want to be with the best" -- No. Throw me in the dumpster. Those trash pandas are my real family.
Careers page is pretty basic; doesn't mention benefits at all, and neither does the job description. Otherwise, Cinder does a good job of explaining what its looking for in this role, and I don't see any major flags.
Holy shit, SO MANY RED FLAGS, SO FAST. This is the most unhinged job description I've ever reviewed.
And there it is, folks, our first Seriously, Maybe Don't of the week! Imagine being an education company that thinks education isn't political. IMAGINE.
Do not do a shot every time you read the words "competent" or "competence." You will die of alcohol poisoning.
I'm extremely confused. Maybe they posted the wrong job description under this job title?