Support Engineer
Y'all. They just...describe what they want. They're not asking for "intelligent rockstars!" I'm verklempt.
Y'all. They just...describe what they want. They're not asking for "intelligent rockstars!" I'm verklempt.
It is galling – to say the least – to see Siena hiring human support for their product when they're happy enough for it to fuel an exaggerated AI craze that's led to a CX employment crisis everywhere else. The words irony and hypocrisy come to mind.
I think they're asking this role to do a lot of things, and unless they're hiring more than one person through this listing, I'm worried about the long-term success and energy of whoever ends up in it.
Overall, while I don't think there are any major flags, the USD salary range is a little low for a Senior Director role of this type, so I'm going to put it in Eh, It's Probably Fine.
Assuming this isn't just for show and they really are rewarding existing employee work and loyalty, it seems like a green flag to me. Overall, this is a clear job description and I see nothing but positive culture signals, so I'm throwing this in Green Means Go!
This role is not a purely CX role, but it does have a clear CX Ops focus, so I'm comfortable listing it here.
Looks like an interesting, meaty role, and I see no major flags. Pay is fantastic.
Love how these companies are independently committing to the theme this week.
Seems great, and the salary is amazing.
The role itself seems fine, but the salary range is very wide, and the low end is way too low for a Lead role (especially at a company like Netflix). I don't think that's enough to put it in Tread Carefully, but I would ask about it if I were a candidate.
Seems like a pretty straightforward role with no major flags. The salary is, of course, Netflix generous.
Seems fine, very corporate, but they're honest about that. Benefits are fine; pay is mostly okay – I think the low end is a little too low for a senior role, but not so low that it's a major flag.
I don't think they really know why they're hiring a Director of Support, which will likely make actually working in this role unpleasant, to say the least.
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean, but you should NEVER EVER take on risk on behalf of the company employing you unless you're, like, a firefighter or something. Which this is very much not.
This job seems fine if very, very corporate.
I think it would probably be fine, except there's no salary transparency, so into Tread Carefully it goes. Womp Womp.
No major flags, Zuora seems to have a good grasp of what they want this position to accomplish, and the salary is excellent. Happy to put this in Eh, It's Probably Fine!
Well, we're certainly building a narrative here, aren't we?
Man, I really want to put this in Eh, It's Probably Fine, but alas, they claim a competitive salary without then sharing the salary. So – well, you know how this ends.
This one is reader-submitted, and y'all. We're whipping out "unclear if you're joining a cult or a company" for maybe the first time ever, and I HAVEN'T EVEN LOOKED AT A JOB LISTING YET.
I debated on whether to rate this one as Tread Carefully or BINGO, and decided on BINGO because of the EEO statement.
This job was fine, fine, mostly fine until we hit the last bits of it, and then it started telling one hell of a story.
I'm on the fence about Drata's "rules" – on the one hand I appreciate the rules are highly visible and clear. But there are also more elements of toxic startup philosophy than I am personally comfortable with.
I'm pretty impressed with the job description overall. They manage to convey the qualities they're looking for without being unnecessarily prescriptive or ableist, they seem to understand well what they're looking for, and the stated goals are unusually grounded for a VP of Success position.