Technical Support Engineer
I think maybe I drank a really bad batch of coffee because nothing makes sense anymore.
The job won Bad Job Bingo. Welp.
I think maybe I drank a really bad batch of coffee because nothing makes sense anymore.
A bilingual candidate with a bachelor's degree in computer science and technical expertise in cloud applications, mobile computing, and hardware device troubleshooting should not be making $35,403 to $59,500. I mean, come the fuck on.
I'll give Mosiac props on owning their job descriptions – I definitely think a person wrote this.
Candidates should have a strong attention to detail, but the company can't consistently capitalize its own name. Okay!
This job description is something else. There I am, minding my own business, thinking this is a normal junior customer service role, and then I read with own two eyes: "A minimum of 7 years in an OPIS CS position[...]or 5-10 years experience in a contact center/customer service environment."
This is a mid-senior role at least – major misalignment between title/responsibilities and requirements.
So much casual (and occasionally weirdly aggressive) ableism in this job listing. Also, the video on their careers page is 1) a product sales pitch, and 2) all dudes. Is the entire leadership team just dudes?
Same deal as with the Customer Success Manager – it's almost the exact same listing, including the degree requirements/GPA question, which seems like even more of a red flag.
Title/seniority are misaligned with the responsibilities of the role. Lots of flags in the "Who you are" section which makes me think this role would not be well supported.
This job description is wacky. Some of the responsibilities are reasonable for a role at this level, and some are most definitely not.
I waffled on where this one should go (BINGO or Seriously, Maybe Don't). There's no Careers page, just a perfunctory EO statement at the bottom of their Jobs page along with a frankly alarming Values statement.
I'll take "What job description was written by AI?" for $400, Alex.
This job is on Otta but isn’t listed on the company's website. But considering the Careers page is super bare-bones, that doesn’t necessarily mean anything.
$53k for a non-entry level, very technical role is laughable. The duties of the role and the title are also misaligned. And yes, again with the “not typical for offers to be made at or near the top of the [salary] range.”
Even aside from the problems in individual descriptions (of which there are plenty), having “Check out our open roles and see if you can make the cut” on your Careers page is an automatic Bingo for me, sorry not sorry.
Neither the title nor the compensation is aligned with the duties of this role.
I will be forever outraged / amused by companies that say their comp is competitive, don’t provide said comp, and then have the audacity to say they’re looking for someone who wants to hold a role for the long-term.
This is an alarmingly low salary for what appears to be at least 3 roles in one. Other flags: poorly edited job description, random mentions of required skills unrelated to job title, generic offering of “Benefits and health insurance.”