Technical Support Operations Manager
I do like their focus on actually pitching themselves to candidates as a good place to workâthat's refreshing, especially after the stinkers in BINGO and Seriously, Maybe Don't.
Roles that require you to spend some portion of your work time in a company-determined location, while allowing you to spend the rest of your work time in a location determined by you.
I do like their focus on actually pitching themselves to candidates as a good place to workâthat's refreshing, especially after the stinkers in BINGO and Seriously, Maybe Don't.
Automatic BINGO! Damn, I don't think that's ever happened so fast. (It's the first thing you see on Ramp's Careers page).
The only reason this isn't going into Green Means Go is that a few responsibilities seem a little senior for this title. That could just be a lack of knowledge of their internal structure and leveling, though. Everything else seems good, and the pay is good for a technical/financial role.
Well, that's some bullshit! Especially for a hybrid role in Denver. BINGO.
The rest of the job description seems fine. And while the pay is good for this role, it isn't for frontline roles, which pisses me off, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
This pay sucks. And for a hybrid role, it sucks way fucking more. BINGO.
Very straightforward Trust & Safety role; nothing jumps out at me as particularly concerning, and the pay is excellent. You'd be working for OpenAI.
The biggest problems are 1) they fall into the "it's a benefit to work here!" trap, and 2) they claim a competitive compensation package without actually sharing what the comp is. The latter, of course, means that this is a Tread Carefully job.
It's probably a little pathetic how easy it is to get me on your side as an AI company. Oh, you're doing the bare minimum? WOULD YOU LIKE A COOKIE?
Honestly, this job description is pretty forgettable. It's not terrible, but it's not good either; candidates get very little information about the structure of the team they'd be leading, and the only hint at culture we get is a single bullet about the office being pet-friendly.
This sounds like a really interesting role with an earnest company, with some neat travel opportunities thrown in. However, since I'm still unsure of what I think about the recruitment video and there's no salary transparency, I'm going to put this in a very tentative Tread Carefully.
I'm sorry, the fuck? You want this role to build out its own completely separate product development function to fix a product so seemingly broken that even the Engineering, Product, and Design teams don't want to deal with it anymore? ARE YOU KIDDING ME
Otherwise, it seems like an interesting role, but I'm disappointed there's no salary transparency and that they ask for desired salary in the application. I thought you were better than that, BetterCloud!
Well, this took a turn. Between this casual ableism, the lack of salary transparency despite competitive claims, and their ask for compensation expectations on the application, the JD practically puts itself in Tread Carefully.
All of this is just a red flag. No information about what supports the Teir 1 team receives, which makes me think they shouldn't expect to receive any, which is just bad news.
Okay, so look. This could just be me. I am highly suspicious and cynical, I fully own that. But everything in this job description just comes across as slightly off. Just, like, this side of reasonable.
There are two different job titles in this job description, Manager, Customer Success and Customer Success Manager. Which one refers to this role specifically? Your guess is as good as mine.
I swear I entered the role title exactly as it's displayed on the job listing. I'm not sure what's going on with this role, but the title in the actual job description is Customer Onboarding Manager, so...I dunno, man, I'm just the rater.
Otherwise, it seems like a straightforward onboarding role, but accessibility issues and lack of salary transparency puts it squarely in Tread Carefully.
I get that these roles will have some overlap, and seniority may be the biggest differentiator, but I dunno. It strikes me as odd and makes me wonder if they are entirely sure about the team's structure.
Hoo boy. Why does this read to me as "We will give you no resources, we will change the parameters of success constantly, and we will offer little to no support toward meeting your strategic goals. Good luck!"
Overall, it's pretty clear they're looking for a discount manager, which is enough to put this in Tread Carefully.
This job seems fine if very, very corporate.
I'm pretty impressed with the job description overall. They manage to convey the qualities they're looking for without being unnecessarily prescriptive or ableist, they seem to understand well what they're looking for, and the stated goals are unusually grounded for a VP of Success position.