Senior Customer Success Manager, Enterprise Accounts
Well-defined (and compensated) role and the company calls out in the JD how much they value their Success team. Obviously depends on how they actually treat the team, but it's nice to see.
Well-defined (and compensated) role and the company calls out in the JD how much they value their Success team. Obviously depends on how they actually treat the team, but it's nice to see.
I don't know if the hiring manager is an immature manager or what's happening here, but whoever wrote this job description does not have a good grasp of what makes a CX professional successful in their work. The only thing keeping this out of BINGO is that the salary is decent.
Given the work this role will be doing and how often they will be working with senior leadership, I think it probably should have a more senior title and a slightly higher salary range.
Other than the casual ableism, this is a straightforward management role with a good compensation package.
Maybe they should have had Siena review this job listing before they posted it.
But I thought this is what Siena was for? Are you saying you need humans to support humans? Real food for thought.
Boy this job opening sure sounds like Support! But nah, can't be, they have their AI for that!
The salary range is interesting, to say the least – the low side is way too low, and I don't trust that the high side is actually on the table.
The duties of the role and title are badly misaligned – this should be a Director-level role.
This actually seems like a fairly well-scoped role, but the lack of salary transparency and culture issues that surfaced in the Head of Support role put this in Tread Carefully.
One day I'll have a whole Bad Job Bingo session without a SaaS company claiming to change the world but TODAY IS NOT THAT DAY
So...this role is a Senior Manager, Strategic Customer Success managing Senior Customer Success Managers collaborating with Account Managers, Managing Directors and Customer Success Managers. Who's on first?
For a hybrid role in NYC, that seems like a low salary range. And there's a *new* two-for-one! Amazing, monday.com over here disrupting corporate red flags, love it.
Ehhhhh. Look. Most people want to do the very best they can, and yes, overachieve. But I am immediately suspicious of any company that wants to codify an employee doing more than what they're being paid for.
Y'all know by now that it doesn't sit well with me when leadership roles are well-compensated and frontline roles are not.
That salary is too low for what they want this role to do, especially considering it's not entry-level and they're a SaaS tech company.
Ah, so they want a discount manager. Cooooool.
Every time they talk about how fun they are, another venture capitalist gets a little red flag pocket square.
Again, a CX pro with an EA background would be a great fit for this role (I know y'all are out there!) and the pay is great.
I'm posting this here because 1) A CX professional would absolutely kill it in this role, and 2) GET THAT MONEY.
Same concerns as with the Support Intern position – no indication of what the pay is or even if the internship is paid at all.
I'm torn on this one. I don't think I've ever seen a Customer Support Intern anywhere else, so that Okta offers an intern program for this is very cool. But the fact that they don't say what the comp is makes me think they're just trying to get Support work on the cheap.
Seems like an interesting, thoughtfully conceived role.