Senior Support Supervisor
My opinions about the gig economy aside (which are mixed—I see the benefits and the considerable downsides), DoorDash's Careers page hero is very, very red and legit hurts my eyes.
My opinions about the gig economy aside (which are mixed—I see the benefits and the considerable downsides), DoorDash's Careers page hero is very, very red and legit hurts my eyes.
Automatic BINGO! Damn, I don't think that's ever happened so fast. (It's the first thing you see on Ramp's Careers page).
This role is very similar to the other Product Support Specialist role, and so I have the same questions about leveling. But again, everything else is good, and the pay range makes sense for what seems to be a slightly more senior role.
Really puts that DEI statement into perspective, though. "We encourage underrepresented minorities to be underpaid in this role, which will affect their future compensation for years, if not forever."
"High stakes" in a job like this means the product doesn't work, or only works enough to be dangerous. You're there as a human shield between the customer and the product, and I promise it isn't even as fun as it sounds.
I think the AI is confused about what Customer Success does.
Welp, a red flag right up front. What a way to dive back into Bad Job Bingo!
Ding ding ding, we have a (BINGO) winner.
I am deeply unimpressed with CoreWeave's showing here. Tread Carefully.
Well, this took a turn. Between this casual ableism, the lack of salary transparency despite competitive claims, and their ask for compensation expectations on the application, the JD practically puts itself in Tread Carefully.
Not much to say about this one except that I'm irritated this leadership role is salaried and more adequately compensated while the frontline roles are not. That's some bullshit, Ramp.
I don't know about Miami, but $46.8K – $55K is shitty pay for a non-entry-level fintech support role in New York, even if it's remote.
You should do a general internet search for Therapy Brands. The results are...not good, particularly in light of the fuss they make about how awesome they are on their Careers page.
It is galling – to say the least – to see Siena hiring human support for their product when they're happy enough for it to fuel an exaggerated AI craze that's led to a CX employment crisis everywhere else. The words irony and hypocrisy come to mind.
Sounds like a neat Knowledge role, and the pay is great (especially for Knowledge work, which is often undervalued).
This job seems fine if very, very corporate.
I'm pretty impressed with the job description overall. They manage to convey the qualities they're looking for without being unnecessarily prescriptive or ableist, they seem to understand well what they're looking for, and the stated goals are unusually grounded for a VP of Success position.
I know this is a bit outside Support knowledge work, but I think it'd be a good fit for CX folks. The position seems fine, and the pay is great.
This role has the same weird (and ableist) culture signals as the other roles at this company. And while there is salary transparency here (likely due to state laws requiring it, which is also a culture signal), the application asks for your target comp range, so into Tread Carefully it goes.
Still as obnoxious as the other two listings on the job board.
I think Snap might be the first company since I've started doing Bad Job Bingo to actually mention anything about wellness for Trust & Safety team members, so it has that going for it. Unfortunately, it also has enough flags that it hits BINGO.
Solid, straightforward job description with no red or yellow flags and a decent salary for what appears to be a truly entry-level Trust & Safety role.
Again, the salary range is really wide, and the low end sucks. But everything else seems pretty straightforward.
I am really struggling to understand this role at Match Group in comparison to the Trust & Safety Policy Manager role at Tinder (one of the dating apps in Match Group's portfolio).