
Director, Technical Support (L2)
"You want to be with the best" -- No. Throw me in the dumpster. Those trash pandas are my real family.
Roles requiring you to work a standard 40 hours per week, regardless of permanent or temporary employee status.
"You want to be with the best" -- No. Throw me in the dumpster. Those trash pandas are my real family.
Careers page is pretty basic; doesn't mention benefits at all, and neither does the job description. Otherwise, Cinder does a good job of explaining what its looking for in this role, and I don't see any major flags.
Holy shit, SO MANY RED FLAGS, SO FAST. This is the most unhinged job description I've ever reviewed.
And there it is, folks, our first Seriously, Maybe Don't of the week! Imagine being an education company that thinks education isn't political. IMAGINE.
Do not do a shot every time you read the words "competent" or "competence." You will die of alcohol poisoning.
I'm extremely confused. Maybe they posted the wrong job description under this job title?
I was worried about doing this one, because I'm such a fan of the product, but Scribe's Careers page is really well done and the job description is mostly fine.
I can't tell if the person who wrote this isn't fluent in English (which I'm not criticizing) or if it was written by AI and really poorly edited (which I am criticizing).
Company overall seems obsessed with "critical thinking" as an attribute, which makes me picture an office where people are, like, constantly running into closed doors. "Bob, Bob! She turned the doorknob! We're free! PUT HER RESUME ON THE TOP OF THE PILE."
I'm gonna be honest: parts of this job description read to me like the unfiltered ramblings of a 40-something divorced white woman who's just discovered hot yoga.
Alma's job descriptions are pretty consistently great.
Duties are pretty standard for a role like this, as are the qualifications. What's frustrating is the lack of standard info, like salary, benefits, or even normal hints about the rest of the company, so I'm putting it in Tread Carefully.
Job description is refreshingly free of "fast-paced, dynamic company" and "rockstar" language that's been so prevalent today. Salary's a little wide, but more than appropriate. This one might be a keeper!
The Must Haves section makes this essentially a highly-skilled senior communicator/engineer role, which makes the salary way too low for what they're asking for.
Veeva is a Public Benefit Corporation. I don't agree with some of their restrictions, but I think their honesty is a green flag.
I really, really hate when the salary is good for leadership roles but poor for frontline roles. The salary is especially egregious considering that it's billed as a technical role, with fluency in Spanish or Portuguese as a nice-to-have. I literally booed when I read that.
My new tagline is going to be - Bad Job Bingo: I read shitty Careers pages you don't have to.
Now I'm drinking because it feels like I'm having a wake for whomever they convince to take this job.
Other than the product being a dystopian nightmare and the fact that "View Open Positions" just directs back to LinkedIn, the job itself is okay. There's a misalignment between the duties of the role and the job title, and the salary is oddly wide. I think this goes firmly in Tread Carefully.
This job description (JD) is 2-3 times longer than the Director of Customer Success JD, despite the role supposedly being much less senior. It's just weird.
I had high hopes for this one, but the "energy" verbiage, the positivity stuff, calling health and dental a "perk" instead of the very important benefits you offer your employees in exchange for their labor...it leaves a bad taste in the mouth, you know?
Salary range is wide but high enough that I don't think anyone will really care.
This one originally appeared in Tread Carefully but I got word from a reader that it might just be a scam. Approach with extreme caution.